The article "Recreation is not just for kids" was devoted to the global, strategic issues, considered the main principles of child taking a break ". The author is at the same time rather flippantly remarked that private, tactical questions, children's activities are no less demanding, but their solution does not require a medical degree.
Nevertheless, and this study confirmed the letters my readers, the average parent without the aforementioned special education decision-making difficult, and most of the issues associated with water treatments. The problem of bathing children, we dedicate this article.
To begin, we note that from a physiological point of view of adult swimming and bathing children significantly different from each other. Due to a fundamental feature of the growing organism - the metabolism of a child significantly more active than an adult. This implies that per unit of time the child produces per unit of body weight more heat than its parents. That is why the water is cold and uncomfortable for moms and dads, is quite suitable for the child. Thus, allowing or prohibiting bathing, you can not rely on your personal feelings. In principle, the child is the main criterion - if he wants the water - albeit bathed, whatever the temperature. But if you walk along the beach, try the water with your fingertip and looks around for support and sympathy, then swimming is probably not worth it. But the actions of the parents should not consist in the fact that swimming is prohibited, as is referred to the sympathy and support for the child is not found.
By the way, once already are talking about bans, dwell on this issue in more detail. Biblical truth about the sweetness of forbidden fruit is a perfect illustration of intrafamily conflict over parental restrictions on children's stay in the water. A strange situation occurs in many families. It would seem, bathing - the action is uniquely useful, beneficial impacts on health, stimulating the immune system, strengthens muscles, develops the lungs, heart and blood vessels. According to the logic and taking into account the above, bathing must be encouraged. But very often the fact of the child's stay in the water is transformed into a prize for good behavior.
Thought out a huge number of possible prohibitions and restrictions. Motivation prohibitions are so diverse that it can brand name viagra only marvel parent resourcefulness. Here and in the traditionally cold water, and too much wind, and it was late (option - it is too early), you have not eaten (option - already eaten), there were bathing a dog (option - drank cow), you have a deuce on the chemistry, you did not listen to grandma, you and your nose so cold and so is not surprising that swimming becomes a child in a very, very sweet and very, very forbidden fruit. Hence, its complexity - home - "I will not drive out of the water." But how can come out here if unknown, the next time be allowed!
It is clear that the problem of swimming (as if swimming is really becomes a problem) it is better not to create, and radically solve (avoid) in early childhood, when your co-residence with the child in nature involves bathing in the ponds.
Absolute norm should be to such a situation, where bathing is a pleasant procedure, which delivers the joy and fun, but completely normal and is not being built into a cult. And it would be pretty good, though denying and denying parents at least occasionally thought about the real reasons most of these prohibitions. Because children, especially small and can not swim, can not be left in the water one, and consequently, bathing children requires a constant presence and supervision by adults. This situation often leads to the fact that my mother standing over kerosene, the pope waiting comrades in preference, and little Petya, you see, hit a swim. In such a complicated family situation, a normal adult will be able to easily zamorochit child's head and come up with "compelling" ban (options we have listed above).
Described situations are, unfortunately, all too often.
All this allows to distinguish in the topic two sets of issues - health care and teaching. The author, as a pediatrician medical issues, of course, is closer, but you can not underestimate the problems of teaching - they are too intertwined with each other. For example, pedagogically unjustified bans lead to medically harmful to swimming blue in the face.
Medical problems do not allow swimming universal recommendations, as largely determined by the initial state of health of the individual child. We emphasize once more that the fact that swimming in open water (ie, the answer to the question "whether or not to allow the swim?") Is less often associated with water temperature and is determined by the wishes of the child. Another thing - the health of the reservoir, the presence of off-site locations for swimming, your belief that a child is that water will not swallow. At this point the decision is entirely determined by savvy parents.
On the question of the duration of bathing should observe the following. Referred to us especially the child's body (a more active heat production), have their inverse (negative) side. The fact that the energy reserves of the body of the child is noticeably lower than in adults, their exhaustion, of course, is faster, hence the much greater risk of hypothermia. Hence an important rule - it is better to bathe often (quite possible - very often), but the duration of water treatments to limit, in order to forestall the blue and his teeth clatter. These things Viagra the era of effective treatment will not make the pedagogical problems if the child is firmly convinced that the next bath will not have to wait for several hours.
Nevertheless, the very fact that the possible hypothermia, and the ingress of water (often not very pure water) in the nose and ears, markedly increases the risk of chronic activation of inflammatory processes in the nasopharynx and ears (chronic tonsillitis, adenoids, otitis, sinusitis). Strictly speaking, listed sores, perhaps, limited list of ailments that require caution while swimming. For diseases of bronchi and lungs, bones and joints of swimming - the factor treatment. At the same time, if your child has a specific disease, it is not superfluous to consult with your doctor is on swimming. For example, increased intracranial pressure is not a contraindication for bathing, but is a contraindication to diving. The same can be said of many inflammatory processes in the ears. In short, not be lazy and visited a neurologist or otolaryngologist before leaving "on the sea", you can reduce the likelihood of problems.
But what can we say with certainty right now: if your child has a chronic inflammation of the nasopharynx, or if frequent strep throat - fresh water, often, has a deleterious (irritating) effect on inflamed tissue, and salty (sea), on the contrary, healing. The implications are clear.
And the last, which is actually a first. Bathing a child in an open pond is dangerous (quite possibly the most dangerous) for a child's life happy. The risk of bathing children is directly related to the sanity of adults.
We will not lecture on the rules of conduct on the water, but the recall of some very important "not" still needed. Beforehand, however, emphasize that there are two major ways of preventing water troubles - timely teaching children swimming and elementary discipline. So:
*
not that children bathed without supervision, even if they know how to swim. It is very important in this case, to look after an adult was not under the influence of intoxicating beverages;
*
should categorically prohibit a child to dive, if he can not swim;
*
must be severely punished for playing with cries of "tone";
*
whatever may have been free swimming mode, any movement of the child toward the water has to be agreed with the adults.
ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น